Good evening to all,
I currently have four hypervisor hosts in a failover cluster configuration. Each host is running Windows Server 2012 Datacenter. Presently three hosts are hosting our 56 virtual machines and the fourth is not hosting any. I also have a 5th server (R720) which has not been configured for Hyper-V.
I have been reading around, trying to prepare myself for the upgrade to Windows Server 2012 R2 and I have come across some articles where the recommended actions are as follows:
1. Live Migrate virtual machines to a host running Server 2012 R2 Datacenter with Hyper-V configuration.
2. Once the VMs have been migrated, perform an in-place upgrade on the hosts running Windows Server 2012 Datacenter to Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter.
3. Verify that the configuration is good on the upgraded hosts and live migrate the VMs back to the upgraded Hypervisors.
My failover cluster does not host any Exchange or SQL Servers that would be affected by the in-place upgrade.
What would be the downside of performing an in-place upgrade on a failover cluster? The production environment would not be affected as the guests would be live migrated to a temporary Hypervisor running Windows Server 2012 R2 Datacenter. I will also be scheduling downtime for this process.
Please advise and thanks in advance,